Laval stating the following: (1) The accumulation of capital is increasingly relying on the ability

The school is experiencing a crisis. [In fact, the changing perception ideological basis of school.] The Enlightenment idea of emancipation with knowledge becoming the market conditions Culture unnecessary myth, [former ideological concept of the school is becoming even an obstacle. From this perspective, it is possible to grasp the schools crisis as a conflict of two concepts, two ideological justification schools, rosalind franklin two expectations of what the school is, and what to serve.] Laval mentions some fundamental social changes that are reflected in the school: the teaching profession and its value have experienced changes increase the social and cultural differences, some professions are dying out, the media industry has a growing importance of socialization inherited normative rosalind franklin principles are becoming uncertain and the like. Because of all this it comes to problems in transmission between generations, and therefore also spoken of the need to reform school. Laval says that this expression works as a magic formula that usually replaces reflection. (11)
Innovation browsing it is necessary to go beyond the question of what ideology you support, while ideology appears as a kind of fate, as something inevitable. Laval's thesis is that neoliberal ideology gradually monopolizing the discourse and reformatorsko dynamics.
Laval trying to book in order to display the new school, which is trying to impose through successive reforms and the dominant discourse. He wants to show the logic that supports fundamental changes in the classroom. Some elements are already rosalind franklin known and the numerous analyzes rosalind franklin already understand the social, cultural, political and economic trends that are changing the education system. But the overall picture of the school system is not yet clear enough. It is trying to do Laval. What? I wonder rosalind franklin in what relationship they stand the idea of the child-king, pobožanstvenega companies, educational manager, decentralized institution, a teacher who does not direct, scientific evaluator, and consumer families. (12) It is these relationships are poorly understood rosalind franklin (visible). The problem is that, since the structure of each of these ideas (images) are different. But it is possible to explore the evolution of [the education system] the last twenty years and compare it with the economic transformation and cultural change. Then it is possible to hope that we will be able to demonstrate how the school institution is increasingly adapting rosalind franklin to the concept of neo-liberal school.
[What is the concept of neo-liberal school?] It is a school model, where education is a private good with an economic value. This means that individuals must capitalize on private funds, the company must ensure their future income. Such privatization of education varies the importance rosalind franklin of knowledge, the importance rosalind franklin of schools as institutions that knowledge and values transmitted rosalind franklin and, finally, the importance of social ties as such. It seems that the institutions exist only in order to serve the interests of individuals. It can be assumed that these changes are due to changes in capitalist societies and economies. Also, the school has become the city of friction. Whether the latter is true?
Laval stating the following: (1) The accumulation of capital is increasingly relying on the ability to innovate and workforce training. (13) The economic effectiveness, which requires increasing scientific management and raising the cultural level of the workforce. [But there is a contradiction here.] rosalind franklin Because capital accumulation is diminishing costs the public purse: the cost of education, they prepared to pay the company must be profitable. rosalind franklin People are mostly companies "human capital". [What does this mean for schools is not difficult to see! International competitiveness of the economic system becomes an indicator of the quality of schools that contribute to it.] Neoliberal reform of education also leads the role of knowledge in economic activity and restrictions imposed by capitalist competition between rosalind franklin businesses. Quote: "The school, which sometimes did not have a center of gravity in purely professional, but also in social, cultural and political values rosalind franklin of knowledge - [...] - the current reforms directed to the objectives of competitiveness prevailing in the globalized economy (14)." The Republican conception of school uravnotežala anomične tendencies (specialization rosalind franklin and divergence of individual interests) and was directed to the creation of a citizen neoliberal conception, [that inspires reform], but the school cramps in production at human capital rosalind franklin in order to maintain the competitiveness of the economy. (14)
Laval says that the neoliberal school is still a tendency rather than a reality, but the hypothesis that [the ideology] rosalind franklin standing in the background, to analyze the current changes. All this of course does not mean that the neoliberal doctrine already won, because rosalind franklin there are many who are resisting the new ideology. Laval also mentions that all the problems are not the result of new developments, but there from before. One of the ongoing problems in France is obvious stratification, which helps maintain the school. (16) Neoliberalism rosalind franklin is offered as a solution to these problems, even if they are not solved but only deepens. Why? Laval mentions two reasons. (1) The first is the superiority of accumulation of capital, which dominates over the other conscious objectives of the company, the achievements of